Nothing happens

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

Better narration and a better story

What was most disappointing about James Naughtie’s story?

Nothing really happened which is Ok but there was no slow revelation of the story. It was all hints and innuendo with no detail. I can understand teasing it out but the London part especially was tedious. The story just didn't move.

How could the performance have been better?

What's with doing female voice in a falsetto! Really not attractive or necessary.

You didn’t love this book--but did it have any redeeming qualities?

The Scottish/mother plot line was the best bit.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

So dull!

Would you try another book written by James Naughtie or narrated by Seán Barrett?

I definitely would not try another by James Naughtie but I'm open minded about the narrator.

Has The Madness of July put you off other books in this genre?

I'm not sure what genre it was. If it was a political thriller/spy type novel it's a poor example. They're my favourite genre.

What didn’t you like about Seán Barrett’s performance?

It was so dull. I struggled to stay awake. To be fair it's probably not his fault and I'd be interested to try something completely different read by him.

You didn’t love this book--but did it have any redeeming qualities?

Not really.

Any additional comments?

None of the characters were interesting or came alive. I struggled to tell the difference between the characters because they all had no personality. The story kept promising that something was going to happen - but it never did! There was murder, suicide, spies - how can someone make that so boring?

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

I really wanted to like this

but it was grim. Despite some lovely descriptions of the Highlands it was slow, melodramatic and not at all enhanced by the style of the narrator ( it was also odd the way he changed accent with the geography of the plot rather than just with each character..) surely an editor could have suggested that there was a little more show and alot less tell? every thought, motive and reaction was detailed - perhaps that would work as notes for a film script but it left nothing to the imagination. I dont know any.siblings who dont interrupt , over talk, spar and compete. The brothers talk to one.another Iike geriatric strangers playing chess.
I thought that I might be comparing it too much to Le Carré so left it for a while and started again but it was like homework.
And having the supposed calamity constantly trailed and anticipated was annoying.
It makes sense it was.written by a.journalist - it was.forensic, detailed and obviously polished but sadly dull and forgettable. None of the characters seemed real or believable, no one did any work and the women were cliches.
sorry

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Disappointing

As an avid Radio 4 man in the morning, I admire James Naughtie's pithy celtic observations on politics on the Today Programme. So I was very keen to listen to this novel set in '70s British politics. There is so much potential in the era and in his deep understanding of what he calls "The Game".

This is an ambitious novel, combining three themes: espionage, a murder mystery and a sensitive family drama between three brothers. All of these are further complicated by a US dimension, set against a political life which rarely provides more than a backdrop.

It strives for a subtle, understated style with clipped, elliptical dialogue, loaded with portent, between players steeped in the parallel "games" of politics and espionage. Le Carre does this stuff masterfully, but that is a high bar to reach. Instead of being portentous, this just turns out to be pretentious, with dialogue and set-pieces reminding me of the most cheesy of '70s melodramas. The denoument lacks a firmer hand in the build-up and so is a bit like a rabbit popping out of a hat.

There are some lyrical passages, especially describing Scotland, and some deft touches where the relationships between the three brothers are concerned. Overall, though, I felt this reached well beyond the capacity of the author to deliver.

Sorry, Jim, still think you are fab in the morning.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful