
Dead Man's Blues
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for £16.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Christopher Ragland
-
By:
-
Ray Celestin
About this listen
Chicago, 1928. In the stifling summer heat, three disturbing events take place: a clique of city leaders is poisoned, a white gangster is found mutilated and a famous heiress vanishes without a trace.
Detectives Michael Talbot and Ida Davis are hired to find the missing heiress, but it proves harder than expected, and so Ida must elicit the help of her friend Louis Armstrong. But will any of them find the answers they need in the capital of jazz, booze and corruption?
©2016 Ray Celestin (P)2016 W.F. Howes LtdCritic reviews
Imaginative story, convincing settings, great characters.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Excellent Sequel.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
vg
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Brilliant story, superb reading
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I like it
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Authentic
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Period pieces are hard to get right. Speaking from experience as an author, you have to make the reader feel like they're living in the time the novel is set. You gotta be able to feel the atmosphere and how different it is from the present.
Celestin tries this. Occasionally, he pulls it off. From a pretty good opening, the novel quickly goes downhill.
Not in plotting or writing style, but just in overall quality.
The main issue is that the author feels as if he has to explain EVERYTHING. Like he needs to tell the reader all the history he's read about 1920s Chicago because he can't waste it.
And it gets real annoying, real fast.
Take the introduction of Al Capone, where instead of letting the character of the man and his history come through with dialogue and character interactions, we get long, drawn-out paragraphs where Celestin tells us Capone's history, how he got his scars, how he hates his scars, and how he came up through the ranks.
When that's over, we get a bit about the Mayor of Chicago being poisoned, and Celestin again proceeds to tell us exactly what the Mayor has done for Capone, how they're so close, and how they've worked together over the years.
Celestin is telling us things. Not showing us in any way.
A better writer would let all of that information come out slowly, through dialogue or character or just how people interact with one another. Capone could have a line about how "after all he's done for the mayor" etc..
But no. We are forced to read the author's carefully researched research summary. So instead of being immersed in the story, we're constantly pulled out of it to learn history in an unengaging way.
It gets so bad that I'd rather not read anything else by Celestin again. He needs to give us time to get immersed. Not keep showing us how much he knows about the 1920s.
Feels Like the Author Would Rather Write History
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
A reasonable listen but not my favourite
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.