Clean(ish)
Eat (Mostly) Clean, Live (Mainly) Clean, and Unlock Your Body's Natural Ability to Self-Clean
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Clean(ish)
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Gin Stephens
-
By:
-
Gin Stephens
About this listen
Clean(ish) leads listeners to a focus on real foods and a healthier home environment free of obvious toxins, without fixating on perfection. By living clean(ish), our bodies’ natural processes become streamlined and more effective, while we enjoy a vibrant life.
In Gin Stephens' New York Times best seller Fast. Feast. Repeat., she showed you how to fast (completely) clean as part of an intermittent fasting lifestyle. Now, whether you’re an intermittent faster or not, Gin shows you how to become clean(ish) where it counts: You’ll learn how to shift your choices so you’re not burdening your body with a bucket of chemicals, additives, and obesogens it wasn’t designed to handle.
Instead of aiming for perfection (which is impossible) or changing everything at once (which is hard, and rarely leads to lasting results), you’ll cut through the confusion, lose the fear, and embrace the freedom that comes from becoming clean(ish). As you learn how to lower your toxic load through small changes, smart swaps, and simple solutions, you’ll evolve simply and naturally toward a clean(ish) lifestyle that works for your body and your life!
©2022 Gin Stephens (P)2022 Macmillan AudioListeners also enjoyed...
To understand - I would recommend this book to anyone who’s interested in this topic
Amazing book
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
HOWEVER as a researcher, it breaks my Post Doc heart that Jin Stevens feels the need to draw conclusions or ask the audience to draw conclusions from things that "possibly" are correlated, or supports a "possible" connection with anecdotal evidence, such as her family history. this is REALLY BAD because to a layman reading, "possibly" means "most likely", while for the researchers writing the journal articles she's referencing "possibly" basically means "there are indications but it might as well be pure randomness, there is no telling" (that is... "possibly" is code for "I invite you to investigate thisresea, because I didn't have the time, the want, or the money") - and Jin knows that, but sometimes seems to ignore it if there is a point she wants across.
Great book, but sometimes science best-practises take a backseat, and it really hurts the author's credibility
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Terrible Read. Very boring
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.