What Really Happened in Congo cover art

What Really Happened in Congo

The CIA, the Murder of Lumumba, and the Rise of Mobutu

Preview

£0.00 for first 30 days

Try for £0.00
Thousands of incredible audiobooks and podcasts to take wherever you go.
Immerse yourself in a world of storytelling with the Plus Catalogue - unlimited listening to thousands of select audiobooks, podcasts and Audible Originals.
£7.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

What Really Happened in Congo

By: Stephen R. Weissman
Narrated by: Kevin Stillwell
Try for £0.00

£7.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically.

Buy Now for £1.79

Buy Now for £1.79

Confirm Purchase
Pay using card ending in
By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. Please see our Privacy Notice, Cookies Notice and Interest-based Ads Notice.
Cancel

About this listen

Newly available evidence shows that the CIA engaged in pervasive political meddling and paramilitary action in Congo during the 1960s - and that the local CIA station chief directly influenced the events that led to the death of Patrice Lumumba, the country's first democratically elected prime minister.

©2014 Foreign Affairs (P)2014 Audible, Inc.
Social Sciences
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about What Really Happened in Congo

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    23
  • 4 Stars
    11
  • 3 Stars
    6
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    23
  • 4 Stars
    8
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    18
  • 4 Stars
    9
  • 3 Stars
    4
  • 2 Stars
    2
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

informative

it seems the CIA was constantly playing catchup with Russia, who had its claws in Africa way before the US understood the potential for natural and human resources.
that sounds like one badly informed foreign affairs policy.
looking back, considering how much money was wasted in the “catchup” game, military sponsorships and “diplomatic” bribery wasn’t the right way to get mass support. military focused organisations forget the humanitarian aspect, and pump money sometimes in the wrong place.
fast-forward to today, when AIDS is recognised officially, a strongly funded AIDS policy would have done better (lifespan, human resources, financial resources, immigration, foreign investments, and more on this track).

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Worth a listen...

Short and worthwhile, but so much is missing! I suppose the truth which is widely known by Afrikans on the continent and in the diaspora will forever remain a mystery in public. Lumumba forever!!!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

what happened in the Congo

a very brief description which left me wanting more..
a little disappointing as unexpected ending.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Worthy of half an hour.

Enjoyable and informative way of spending half an hour of your time.
Will be seeking out further works by Foreign Affairs.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Interesting. Misleading. Informative.

Lots of good background and poor conclusions.

It's written from an American perspective entirely, and is therefore at best an arse covering article. Obviously.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!