The Rapture
Christianity's Most Preposterous Belief
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £11.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Ken Miller
About this listen
There continue to be many questions concerning the "Rapture" of the Church and its apparent contrast with the "Second Coming" of Jesus Christ. Where does this strange view come from? Is the term "rapture" even in the Bible?
Clearly, the idea of the Rapture can be considered the most preposterous belief in Biblical Christianity. The situation regarding the doctrine of the Rapture is painfully similar to the famous quote by Dr. Richard Feynman, speaking of quantum physics:
"I think it is safe to say that no one understands quantum mechanics...in fact, it is often stated of all the theories proposed in this century, the silliest is quantum theory. Some say that the only thing that quantum theory has going for it, in fact, is that it is unquestionably correct."
©2002, 2016 Chuck Missler (P)2016 Chuck MisslerWhat listeners say about The Rapture
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Stephen
- 27-09-16
Very expository
A very expository Book. Really explained some of the Myths about the Rapture. God bless.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
- Ian Murdoch
- 08-05-19
Comprehensive overview of the subject.
I have a lot of respect for Dr Chuck Misler as a Bible teacher. This book I thought was a good overview of the subject, but in places suffered from the pre-concieved notiion that the Rapture will be a "pre-millenial" event. In places huge assumptions are made without any real backup from scripture, or logical argument just becuase of the authors assumption about the timing of the event. I would love to have seen the pre-millenial evidence presented as comprehensively as the other information. Otherwise, I thought this was worthy of 5 stars, and would grace anyone's library.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!