Great stories ruined by the reader

These are great stories by a well loved author totally ruined by an dreadful reading. I was unable to complete the book due to the incomprehensible reading. The stresses are constantly wrong on each sentence, he ignores punctuation so stops in the wrong place making the whole meaning of what was written confused and messy. Accents and voices all over the place. Do not waste your money on this book.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

6 people found this helpful

Let down by the naration

I had never come across these stories before and was intrigued. However as they progress the narration gets more annoying.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

5 people found this helpful

William Shatner reads...

What did you like best about The Man Who Knew Too Much and Other Stories? What did you like least?

These intricate little detective stories published in 1922 are a window into another world, before the fall of the British Empire written by a man at once sceptical and very much part of it. Some of it makes one wince at the casual racism but it is very much of its era and it's hard to find an author from then that doesn't share that fault.

What was one of the most memorable moments of The Man Who Knew Too Much and Other Stories?

In the Hole in the Wall he writes, I paraphrase, "we live in at time when people believe anything without evidence and accept nothing from authority" which made me think not much has changed.

Would you be willing to try another one of Alan Munro’s performances?

Absolutely not! Leaving aside the curious choice of an American to read quintessentially English stories, he has the reading style of William Shatner. There's inappropriate emphasis on random words, sudden pauses mid-phrase and then sentences that run into each other, it made following the quite detailed stories very difficult. Before I checked I thought it might be a particularly bad text reader.

Was The Man Who Knew Too Much and Other Stories worth the listening time?

Yes, despite the reader. I wouldn't spend more than a couple of quid on it though, it's not worth a token.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Decent period yarns badly read

Like many I felt the reading was woeful: pauses in the wrong place, stresses on the wrong word/syllable and using an American narrator when the stories are quintessentially English was perverse. However, all that did not offend me sufficiently to stop listening and I got used to it enough to finish the book. It was an interesting take on life, class and politics (and anti-jewish prejudice) in the early 20th century.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The most awful narration ever

While the timbre of the narrator's voice is spot on it would appear that he has never understood the effect of punctuation on narration. He pauses in all the wrong places and the emphasis on the text is seemingly random. I have tried and tried to get through this but it just drives me nuts. The book was purchased as part of a deal from Audible so there is not much milage in returning it (a service I salute Audible for) but I would like a shot if I had wasted a whole credit on it.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Love CJK as a rule, but...

Totally incomprehensible because of poorly emphasised reading. Reader has wonderful tone, but no text understanding.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Dreadful Narration!

I was determined to finish the book, but this narrator made it such hard work. He has a rhythm he sticks to regardless of sense or sentence. I will avoid him at all costs in the future.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

8 people found this helpful